Confusion gives Technology Innovation Agency trouble
By Freestate On 17 Jul, 2013 At 03:12 PM | Categorized As Technology News | With 2 Comments

tech1

Miscommunication has left the TIA in a spin, with a review saying that is why private and public sector players “lack confidence” in the agency.

An external view into the Technology Innovation Agency (TIA) – which government hoped would be a silver bullet to fix South Africa’s innovation problems – speaks of confusion about its purpose, “toxic relationships” with its line department and jockeying for influence within the state agency as reasons for it “not meeting the expectations of stakeholders”.

TIA was established in 2008, through the TIA Act, with the aim of bridging the innovation chasm between innovation and marketable product. It was an amalgamation between seven entities, namely the Innovation Fund, the Tshumisano Trust, the implementation unit of the Advanced Manufacturing Technology Strategy and biotechnology regional innovation centres Cape Biotech, BioPAD, LIFElab and PlantBio.

The TIA Act states that the agency must “support the state in stimulating and intensifying technological innovation in order to improve economic growth and the quality of life of all South Africans by developing and exploiting technological”. In the department’s business case for establishing the entity, it said that TIA’s ultimate goal was to “use South Africa’s science and technology base to develop new industries, create sustainable jobs and help diversify the economy away from commodity exports towards knowledge-based industries equipped to address modern global challenges”.

But the path of TIA, which has been allocated R482-million in this financial year, has been dogged with problems – which are explicitly laid out in the review. Three main problems run through the review: one, that there is confusion on both the part of the department of science and technology and TIA about the agency’s mandate; two, the merging of seven entities set TIA on a difficult road from its inception, with historic financial mismanagement and power-battles; and three, a breakdown in the relationship between the department and TIA, which the report describes as “toxic”.

When the Mail & Guardian previously spoke to both parties, TIA chief executive Simphiwe Duma said that the agency had to make a return on investment to be financially sustainable, while Science and Technology Minister Derek Hanekom said earlier this year that making money was not the agency’s “core mandate”. “If they bring in some [money], that’s not a bad thing because it adds to the budget.”

The question of whether the agency makes money is integral to its functioning because it dictates the kinds of projects that the agency funds. The report reflects this difference in focus: “TIA seemed to display a strong affinity for a return-on-investment model, seeking returns on the TIA balance sheet rather than in respect of social and economic development in the national interest.

“This emphasis on short-term return might be driving TIA’s investment in late-stage projects, which should rather come from venture capital and private equity.”

No easy road
But even before it got its chief executive and began functioning in 2010, the agency was in for a rough ride. The merging of seven entities brought financial woes as they had not previously been governed in terms of the Public Finance Management Act or been held to it, which meant that TIA inherited these financial hangovers and transgressions, resulting in a qualified audit report for the 2010/11 financial year.

But there were greater problems than money. Each entity had its own culture and way of doing things, and all of their heads were included on the first TIA board to facilitate a smooth transition, but appeared to have the opposite effect as “the staff of the various [biotechnology regional innovation centres] believed ‘their’ respective former chairs could be lobbied to ‘fight their battles’ on the TIA board”, the report notes. Also, there were “serious tensions among the senior managers of the entities merged into the TIA as they allegedly jockeyed for positions of influence in the new agency”.

At the same time, there was a turnover of department staff who were involved in this process. The report notes the view among some stakeholders that “TIA was ‘doomed to fail’ from its very inception” because of a lack of leadership from the department and that now there is a “clear disjuncture between the views of the [department] and the TIA”.

Then there’s the question of who to fund. The report notes that regional heads of technology stations, which are based at universities, feel marginalised; the public and private stakeholders felt a “distinct lack of confidence” in the agency. Adding to the expectations, the report says that the department expected TIA to facilitate turning publically-funded research in universities and science councils in marketable products, while the reality is that the industry is the major performer of research and development in the country.

The report makes 12 recommendations that, it believes, will help guide the agency which is trapped in the invidious position of trying to be everything to everyone and inevitably disappointing. They range from urgent bilateral meetings between the department and the TIA, to operational issues. The main over-arching theme seems to be one of communication, with TIA’s current situation being largely the result of both the agency and the department talking past each other. It is now a matter of seeing when and how they will be implemented.

Mail&Guardian

Displaying 23 Comments
Have Your Say
  1. find more says:

    Suffer from kidney disease? improve your kidney health naturally

  2. Suffer from kidney disease? improve your kidney health naturally

  3. Hey There. I found your blog the usage of msn. That is an extremely smartly written article. I will be sure to bookmark it and come back to learn extra of your helpful info. Thank you for the post. I will definitely comeback.

  4. I feel this is among the most significant info for me. And i am happy studying your article. However wanna observation on few general issues, The web site taste is ideal, the articles is actually great : D. Good process, cheers

  5. Thanks for the auspicious writeup. It in reality was once a enjoyment account it. Look complicated to far introduced agreeable from you! By the way, how could we keep up a correspondence?

  6. thought about absolutely love cheap rs gold however i dont like the bailey control keys a whole lot of. even though you may wish to prevent the flap all the way up, still it tumbles doowwn. yoouur denim jeans really do not enter as easily additionally they loook especially sagging. i wouldn’t highly recommend acquiring bailey buuttons, although i would most likely highly recommend becoming merely the typical vintage. they are simply muuuch far better.

  7. As i found a few rusty hearts power level I shall talk about Having been instead of very interested, in the same way I’m training My wife and i organize them. When My wife and i earned these products I used to be definitely upset. I organized these individuals dimensions Ten and i wound up with a very specifications that will were equivalent to a behavior which are usually discovered on the ankles and shins to do with bigfoot, because of the rusty hearts power level were definitely much too substantial and so vast. Although they have been fine Naturally i considered perfectly stupid putting any of them. Sure enough, it actually is a process incredibly easily secured, so that sold each of them on the grounds that have been too large. So, quite some time later on , My wife and i collected these businesses and so they squeeze ok. I seemed to be delighted up until We observed that the entire tab was missing in of your rusty hearts power level and therefore the many other you an opening in the gift basket. Afterwards, Merely threw in the towel plus tossed it out in the open. My spouse and i is not going to wasting nowadays involving my own time.

  8. What a data of un-ambiguity and preserveness of valuable knowledge about unpredicted feelings.

  9. I just like the valuable info you provide for your articles. I will bookmark your weblog and take a look at again here regularly. I’m somewhat certain I will learn lots of new stuff proper right here! Good luck for the next!

  10. maurshaunemt says:

    il Arrive… Une telle coïncidence accidentelle
    maurshaunemt bb4arg48

  11. мебель says:

    What’s up colleagues, how is everything, and what you would like to say concerning this article, in my view its in fact amazing for me.

  12. mardettricmt says:

    Qual è la frase … Super, brillante idea
    mardettricmt bb4arg48

  13. I need to to thank you for this very good read!
    ! I absolutely loved every bit of it. I have
    you book-marked to check out new stuff you
    post…

  14. Lindsey says:

    We have decided to open our POWERFUL and PRIVATE website traffic system to the public for just a few days! You can sign up for our UP SCALE network with a free trial as we get started with the public’s orders. Imagine how your bank account will look when your website gets the traffic it deserves. Visit us today: http://bit.ly/12XAyKI

  15. kenyonmt says:

    Comme il est curieux. :)
    kenyonmt bb4arg48

  16. Wonderful, what a weblog it is! This web site presents
    helpful facts to us, keep it up.

  17. seo says:

    Hello Web Admin, I noticed that your On-Page SEO is is missing a few factors, for one you do not use all three H tags in your post, also I notice that you are not using bold or italics properly in your SEO optimization. On-Page SEO means more now than ever since the new Google update: Panda. No longer are backlinks and simply pinging or sending out a RSS feed the key to getting Google PageRank or Alexa Rankings, You now NEED On-Page SEO. So what is good On-Page SEO?First your keyword must appear in the title.Then it must appear in the URL.You have to optimize your keyword and make sure that it has a nice keyword density of 3-5% in your article with relevant LSI (Latent Semantic Indexing). Then you should spread all H1,H2,H3 tags in your article.Your Keyword should appear in your first paragraph and in the last sentence of the page. You should have relevant usage of Bold and italics of your keyword.There should be one internal link to a page on your blog and you should have one image with an alt tag that has your keyword….wait there’s even more Now what if i told you there was a simple WordPress plugin that does all the On-Page SEO, and automatically for you? That’s right AUTOMATICALLY, just watch this 4minute video for more information at. Seo Plugin

  18. shellmt says:

    Confusione.
    shellmt bb4arg48

  19. Saved as a favorite, I like your site!

  20. Hi there, after reading this awesome article i am too
    happy to share my know-how here with mates.

  21. Hi there! This post couldn’t be written any better! Reading this post reminds me of my previous room mate! He always kept talking about this. I will forward this write-up to him. Pretty sure he will have a good read. Thanks for sharing!

  22. Hey! This is kind of off topic but I need some guidance from an established blog.
    Is it very difficult to set up your own blog?
    I’m not very techincal but I can figure things out pretty fast. I’m thinking about
    creating my own but I’m not sure where to start. Do you have any ideas or suggestions? Many thanks

  23. Howdy! Do you know if they make any plugins
    to protect against hackers? I’m kinda paranoid about losing everything I’ve worked hard on.
    Any recommendations?